abraxas_gustavo escribió:Azazel escribió:En unos años Europa sacará un 5ª o un 6ª mejor que el PAKFA
Mmmmm??!!!!
Cuantos años serian?
Según a quién preguntes, puede que ninguno
(enlace)
Un saludo
abraxas_gustavo escribió:Azazel escribió:En unos años Europa sacará un 5ª o un 6ª mejor que el PAKFA
Mmmmm??!!!!
Cuantos años serian?
abraxas_gustavo escribió:Azazel escribió:En unos años Europa sacará un 5ª o un 6ª mejor que el PAKFA
Mmmmm??!!!!
Cuantos años serian? por que la verdad ya deberían al menos tener algún plan...la verdad es que no no hay ningún avión de quinta generación planeado ,mas bien no tienen el dinero para hacerlo ,tienen el lastre del EFA. Si quieren entrar al club se tendrán que conformar con el F-35 que en electrónica es una mole pero la versión americana pero no la de exportación, y en performances es algo cuestionable… y el precio!!! O_o da risa leer que se planeaba ser mas económico que el F-16!!!
abraxas_gustavo escribió:la verdad es que no no hay ningún avión de quinta generación planeado ,mas bien no tienen el dinero para hacerlo ,tienen el lastre del EFA.
Lockheed Sneaks Another F-35 Under the Wire
Posted by Graham Warwick at 12/31/2010 10:16 AM CST
On the eve of the New Year, Lockheed Martin got another F-35 test aircraft flying, with AF-4 - a CTOL F-35A - making the program's 410th and last flight on 2010 on Dec. 30. That means nine development-test aircraft are flying, but leaves three still to get airborne.
blog post photo
Photos: Lockheed Martin
On paper, the F-35 test program looks more successful than expected in 2010, with 410 flights versus a plan of 394 - but dig down and look at test points rather than test flights and the results were a mixed bag. Although the program ended the year close to its plan of acheiving almost 3,800 test points, they did not add up quite as expected.
The CTOL F-35A ended the year 50% ahead of plan on test points because aircraft AF-1 and -2 at Edwards AFB kept on flying, averaging 10 flights a month from June onwards. The F-35C carrier variant ended the year 125% ahead of plan, which was modest anyway because only one aircraft, CF-1, is flying.
The STOVL F-35B, however, ended the year 18% behind plan on test points because mechanical realibility issues prevented the four aircraft at NAS Patuxent River achieving the same flight rate as the F-35As. More critically, the program achieved less than half the test points required for two key objectives: ready for training (RFT) flight clearance and initial ship trails.
Both objectives were planned to be accomplished in 2010, but will now slip to the middle of 2011. Initial ship trials, orginally scheduled for March, are now planned between late August and November. That window is based on when the LHD-class amphibious assault ship USS Wasp can be modified with instrumentation to measure the ship environment during STOVL operations.
To achieve clearance for ship trails, the F-35B must complete 40 vertical landings in a range of conditions. The program has only done 10 since March 2010, seven of which count towards the total required. STOVL-mode testing was suspended in September, when premature wear on auxiliary-inlet door hinges was discovered. Vertical landings are expected to resume in January.
blog post photo
Auxiliary doors are aft of the lift-fan door (here open to 65deg)
Hinge wear has been traced to higher-than-predicted airloads on the auxiliary doors. Components have been redesigned, but the main fix is to change the operation of the large lift-fan door forward of the auxiliary-inlet doors. Flight tests have shown that, when the lift-fan door is fully open, loads on the auxiliary doors are reduced.
Originally, the lift-fan door was scheduled to open to 65deg below 120kt in semi-jet-borne flight, and to 35deg above that airspeed. Now the door will stay fully open to 165kt to reduce the loads on the auxiliary-inlet doors. Lockheed's JD McFarlan, who is now in change of the test program, says the change does not significantly impact short take-off performance.
Investigation of the hinge-wear problem also revealed a lot of variation of the loads on the auxiliary doors caused by aircraft sideslip, so McFarlan says the flight-control software has been adjusted to tailor the slideslip characteristics in semi-jet-borne flight.
Following these changes, aircraft BF-2 is expected to make its first vertical landing early in the New Year. Along with BF-1, the original STOVL-mode test aircraft, BF-2 will then take up the task of clearing the F-35B test fleet for initial ship trails. This is now expected to be completed by the summer.
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/de ... 6ad46ecbb2
SAAB escribió:Hola.
Estoy hablando de las versiones "A" y "C"
SAAB escribió:Hola.
Yo no soy un Anti-EFA,pero sobre el F35,me gustaria decir que el C lleva un 150% de adelanto y el A lleva tambien mucho adelanto.¿Cuanto lleva de retrasos el EFA?
Un Saludo.
SAAB escribió:Hola.
Estoy hablando de las versiones "A" y "C"
On paper, the F-35 test program looks more successful than expected in 2010, with 410 flights versus a plan of 394 - but dig down and look at test points rather than test flights and the results were a mixed bag. Although the program ended the year close to its plan of acheiving almost 3,800 test points, they did not add up quite as expected.
faust escribió:bueno azazel, sin decir que son mejores que el EFA, hay paises que tienen o estan poniendo en servicios plataformas que, si bien cierto no descontaminaran los cielos de EFAs, y que posiblemente no haya posibilidades remotas de algun enfrentamiento directo entre ellos, creo que desestimar a Rafales, los Su-30 de irkut (Su-30MKI/MKA/MKM) los Su-35 y los F-18E es algo bastante fó de tu parte...
incluso, y aunque tengan -la typhoonmafia- un amplisimo desprecio hacia los refritos de plataformas "viejas" como son un F-15C con APG-63(V3) o un Su-27 adecuadamente modernizado, sin lugar a duda que la realidad es que esas plataformas tambien tienen algun chance contra, el que parece, que está en el tope de la cadena alimentaria: EF-2000
Azazel escribió:Ya se que hay mucha gente que no le gusta el EFA. Pero os guste o no, durante esta década ni rusia, ni china tienen nada decente con lo que enfrentarse a mas de 400 EFAs. Si os queréis creer que es un lastre, allá vosotros, pero el hecho es que GARANTIZA LA SUPREMACÍA EUROPEA FRENTE A LOS RUSKIS, Y FRENTE A CUALQUIERA QUE NO SEA LOS USA DURANTE ESTA DECADA.
dacer escribió:SAAB escribió:Hola.
Yo no soy un Anti-EFA,pero sobre el F35,me gustaria decir que el C lleva un 150% de adelanto y el A lleva tambien mucho adelanto.¿Cuanto lleva de retrasos el EFA?
Un Saludo.
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-35
* F-35A, es una variante que utiliza el aterrizaje y despegue convencional (CTOL), destinada a reemplazar los F-16 Fighting Falcon de la Fuerza Aérea de los Estados Unidos hacia 2011.
* F-35B, variante con capacidad de aterrizaje vertical y despegue corto (STOVL), reemplazará a los F/A-18 Hornet del Cuerpo de Marines de los Estados Unidos, los AV-8 Harrier del Cuerpo de Marines y de la Marina de Italia y los Harrier GR7/GR9 de la Royal Air Force y la Royal Navy hacia 2012.
* F-35C, versión con capacidad para ser embarcada (CATOBAR) que sustituirá los modelos A, B, C y D de los F/A-18 Hornet de la Armada de los Estados Unidos hacia 2012.
Si si, me parece que si. Quizas lleve un 50% de adelanto este año, en el que ya lleva de retraso unos cuantos años.
Sigue soñando.
sl2
Editado:SAAB escribió:Hola.
Estoy hablando de las versiones "A" y "C"
On paper, the F-35 test program looks more successful than expected in 2010, with 410 flights versus a plan of 394 - but dig down and look at test points rather than test flights and the results were a mixed bag. Although the program ended the year close to its plan of acheiving almost 3,800 test points, they did not add up quite as expected.
Lo que dice es que el 2010, acabo mejor de lo que habian planeado. PERO NO RESPECTO AL GLOBAL DEL PROYECTO, si no solo a lo que esperaba hacer ese año, en el cual ya se llevaba mucho retraso, y se habia "bajado" el calendario de pruebas viendo que no era realista por la experiencia pasada.
Es como si a nosotros nos tuvieran que entregar 4 EFAs en 2011 y nos entregan 5. Significa eso que el EFA lleva un adelanto del 125%?. No, significa que este año se fue a mejor ritmo de lo esperado, pero en el global se va con retraso.
Sl2
SAAB escribió:¿para cuándo deberia haber entrado en servicio el tranche 3?
SAAB escribió:¿y cuanto adelanto lleva el EF?¿para cuándo deberia haber entrado en servicio el tranche 3?
El tranche 1 del EF,que es el que tienen actualmente sus operadores,¿En que superan a un F18E o un F15?¿en precio?¿en componentes de procedencia nacional?
Hasta que no haya tranche 3 al completo,el EF es poco mas(por no decir igual) que un caza de su clase de los que actualmente se fabrican,pero a mayor coste economico y restrasos.
Un Saludo.
Spanish Air Force receives first Tranche 2 Eurofighter aircraft
The Spanish Air Force (SpAF) has received the first three Eurofighter production aircraft of Tranche 2. The fourth unit will be delivered in the near future. The delivery follows the Type Acceptance agreement for Block 8 (Tranche 2) achieved on 12th September.
Enrique Barrientos, CEO of EADS Defence & Security in Spain, underlined that “the Spanish Air Force is more and more getting benefit from the maturity achieved by the most advanced new-generation combat aircraft in operation. The delivery of these Tranche 2 aircraft steps into the following phase of operational capabilities for our customers and underlines the continuous technological enhancement of the weapon system”.
According to the production umbrella contract, the four Partner Nations committed themselves to the acquisition of 620 Eurofighter aircraft in three tranches, and Spain participates with 87 units. The delivery of the Tranche 1 (19 aircraft for SpAF) concluded in September last year. Tranche 2 foresees the production of 34 new SpAF aircraft. The main difference between Tranche 1 and Tranche 2 aircraft is a new suite of computers and enhanced air-to-ground capabilities. More processing power (speed and memory capacity) will be the enabler for capability insertion.
Moreover, all Tranche 2 aircraft already delivered will eventually go through the Phase One Enhancements programme, agreed in March 2007, integrating the latest achievements. This programme covers new software and an enhanced multi-role Human-Machine Interface (HMI). Furthermore, the Multiple Information and Distribution System (MIDS), the Global Positioning System, the Defensive Aids Subsystems and the communication systems will be upgraded. Finally this programme foresees the integration of the Laser Designator Pod (LDP) and of additional weapons such as Paveway IV and EGBU-16.
Meanwhile the four Eurofighter partner companies continue with the development programme of advanced solutions for the Eurofighter weapon system. Deliveries of Tranche 2 aircraft to the customer air forces have started on 10th October 2008 with the handover of BS040 to the Royal Air Force. More than 60 Block 8 (Tranche 2) aircraft are currently in the final assembly lines across the four partner companies.
Usuarios navegando por este Foro: ClaudeBot [Bot] y 2 invitados