FTGW_3 escribió:Los problemas con Irán son sus plantas nucleares, no és de guerra total, para incapacitar la producción de uranio enriquecido solo parar sus plantas nucleares, para parar sus plantas nucleares solo incapacitar la operación de los reactores con la destruición de sus sistemas de monitoración, comando, refrigeración, etc, no de destruir la zona de los reactores que causa contaminación. Esto lo pueden hacer el Eurofigther, F-15E, etc.
Las plantas nucleares no son enterradas como bunkers, sus instalaciones no van a mas de dos pisos bajo la tierra.
Falso de toda falsedad.
Los reactores son uno de los blancos a atacar. Pero los verdaderamente importantes son las plantas de reprocesamiento y enriquecimiento. Los reactores por sí solos no pueden producir material de uso militar.
Y justamente son las granjas de centrífugas enriquecedoras las que han sido enterradas.
Iran Shielding Its Nuclear Efforts in Maze of Tunnels
Last September, when Iran’s uranium enrichment plant buried inside a mountain near the holy city of Qum was revealed, the episode cast light on a wider pattern: Over the past decade, Iran has quietly hidden an increasingly large part of its atomic complex in networks of tunnels and bunkers across the country.
In doing so, American government and private experts say, Iran has achieved a double purpose. Not only has it shielded its infrastructure from military attack in warrens of dense rock, but it has further obscured the scale and nature of its notoriously opaque nuclear effort. The discovery of the Qum plant only heightened fears about other undeclared sites.
...
Even the Israelis concede that solid rock can render bombs useless. Late last month, the Israeli defense minister, Ehud Barak, told Parliament that the Qum plant was “located in bunkers that cannot be destroyed through a conventional attack.”
Heavily mountainous Iran has a long history of tunneling toward civilian as well as military ends, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has played a recurring role — first as a transportation engineer and founder of the Iranian Tunneling Association and now as the nation’s president.
There are hundreds, perhaps thousands, of big tunnels in Iran, according to American government and private experts, and the lines separating their uses can be fuzzy. Companies owned by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps of Iran, for example, build civilian as well as military tunnels.
No one in the West knows how much, or exactly what part, of Iran’s nuclear program lies hidden. Still, evidence of the downward atomic push is clear to the inquisitive.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/06/world ... wanted=all
Tunneling Near Iranian Nuclear Site Stirs Worry
By Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, July 9, 2007
The sudden flurry of digging seen in recent satellite photos of a mountainside in central Iran might have passed for ordinary road tunneling. But the site is the back yard of Iran's most ambitious and controversial nuclear facility, leading U.S. officials and independent experts to reach another conclusion: It appears to be the start of a major tunnel complex inside the mountain.
The question is, why? Worries have been stoked by the presence nearby of fortified buildings where uranium is being processed. Those structures in turn are now being connected by roads to Iran's nuclear site at Natanz, where the country recently started production of enriched uranium in defiance of international protests.
As a result, photos of the site are being studied by governments, intelligence agencies and nuclear experts, all asking the same question: Is Iran attempting to thwart future military strikes against its nuclear facility by placing key parts of it in underground bunkers?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 01307.html
. Lo que se ha desarrollado y evolucionado es un software de reconocimiento de voz que discriminase la procedencia de origen del sujeto, así como distorsiones procedentes de un catarro, de la máscara de oxígeno, de los esfuerzos inherentes al vuelo o de que el tío se haya metido tres claras de huevo la noche anterior. ¿Qué pasa que ahora en España hay que desarrollar uno para cada Autonomía, y en los States uno para cada Estado?.
