Malcomn ¿todos los vecinos de Israel, tienen radares capaces de detectar a los F-35?. Gracias y saludos.
Sip, cualquier radar del mundo es capaz de detectar un F-35.
La unica variable es ¿a que distancia?
Saludos.
House Reverses Itself, Votes To Kill F-22 Buy
Just four weeks after the U.S. House of Representatives voted by an overwhelming margin to begin buying a dozen more F-22s, the representatives reversed themselves July 30 and approved a defense appropriations bill that would end the stealth-fighter program.
Why the difference? President Barack Obama, the U.S. Air Force and Lockheed Martin.
"I think when the president made it clear that he would veto a bill containing F-22 funding, the House and Senate have both indicated that they do not wish to risk a veto over that one issue," said Scott Lilly, a former staff director of the House Appropriations Committee.
The defense appropriations bill provides $640.4 billion for the U.S. military for 2010. That includes $128.2 billion for fighting the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. F-22 funding was a fraction of a percent of the total, not enough for many lawmakers to risk the whole bill, Lilly said.
"The veto threat really made a difference," agreed Christopher Hellman, a defense budget specialist for the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation. "When the president says he's going to veto a bill, it means something."
Lockheed, which builds the F-22 Raptor, also influenced the vote, mainly by its silence, said Loren Thompson, a defense analyst at the Lexington Institute, Arlington, Va.
"For the first time ever, the Air Force and the contractor were not lobbying to save the program," Thompson said.
Indeed, senior Air Force officials testified against buying more Raptors.
For Lockheed, it became a matter of sacrificing the F-22 to preserve the much more lucrative F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, he said.
The F-35 is "the biggest defense program in the history of the world." Ultimately, it may be worth more than $1 trillion to Lockheed. "It's absolutely huge," Thompson said. Lockheed decided not to anger the Obama administration - and possibly endanger the F-35 - by crossing swords with Defense Secretary Robert Gates "over a few additional F-22s," Thompson said.
The U.S. military plans to buy 2,443 F-35s, and eight foreign countries are expected to buy hundreds more.
"For the contractor, the quid pro quo was clear," Thompson said. "Cease and desist on the F-22 and keep the F-35."
Gates, too, helped prepare the way for votes against the F-22, Thompson said.
In June 2008, he forced Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne and Gen. Michael Moseley, the service's chief of staff, to resign. The immediate cause was lax Air Force handling of nuclear weapons.
But Moseley and Wynne had repeatedly clashed with Gates over the F-22. They wanted more stealth fighters and Gates did not.
Those factors were bubbling in the background when Obama issued his veto threat.
Before the House voted on the defense authorization bill, the White House warned that if the bill included funding for more F-22s, "the president's senior advisers would recommend a veto."
The House ignored the warning and passed the bill with F-22 funding by 389-22.
By July 15, as the Senate was preparing to vote on its version of the authorization bill, Obama's position had hardened. This time, the White House warned that if the final bill contained F-22 money, "the president will veto it."
The Senate removed F-22 funding and passed its defense authorization bill by unanimous consent.
The White House issued the same veto admonition to the House on July 28, two days before the vote on the defense appropriations bill, which provides the actual money for authorizations. The House voted 269-165 to pass an amendment that would shift $369 million slated to buy parts for new F-22s to purchase spare parts and engines for existing aircraft.
The House then passed the 2010 Defense Appropriations Act by 400-30.
It looks like the end of the production line for the F-22, said Mandy Smithberger of the Project on Government Oversight, which has long opposed the F-22 as overpriced and built for a threat that no longer exists.
But, Smithberger cautioned, nothing is final until versions of the authorization and appropriations bills are passed by Congress and signed by the president. The Senate has yet to vote on its version of the appropriations bill.
Conceived in the early 1980s to battle Soviet fighters over Europe, the F-22 was plagued by production delays and cost overruns. The first planes didn't become operational until late 2005, and by then they cost about $360 million per plane, including development costs. They have not yet flown in combat.
"This thing has got more lives than a vampire," Hellman said. Right now, the F-22's future looks bleak, but the production line will turn out F-22s for several more years, he said.
A new study - possibly the 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review - may recommend producing more F-22s, or a change in the threat environment could revive the program.
"Until I see its severed head, I'm not ready to rule it totally out at this point," Hellman said.
Israel’s Skyhawk Scandal Leads to End of an Era
McDonnell Douglas’ A-4 Skyhawk, aka. “Scooter,” has a long and storied career as a carrier-based attack aircraft with the US Navy. It’s old enough that Sen. John McCain was flying one when he was shot down over North Vietnam. It also has a storied land-based career with the Israeli Air Force, who used this simple, pilot-friendly aircraft from late 1967 onward as a versatile attack aircraft with surprising air-air teeth.
Israel’s induction of F-16s was a turning point for the type, which has declined in importance but never vanished from service. Some are in storage or used as specialty platforms, others have been sold or leased to private operators, and the “Flying Tigers” of 102 Squadron at Hatzerim Air Base still use their A-4Ns and 2-seat TA-4Js for advanced IAF Lead-In Fighter Training.
A maintenance scandal has led Israel to conclude, after more than 40 years, that its Skyhawks need replacement. The latest news involves an official Israeli delegation that’s in South Korea to test-fly KAI’s supersonic T-50
On Wings of Skyhawks: Service in Israel
The Skyhawk is a much-beloved jet in the Israeli Air Force. The little A-4’s surprising maneuverability was coupled with an equally surprising ability to take battle damage, made it a popular and reliable choice over several wars. The type was used heavily in the 1973 Yom Kippur War, and the Israeli fleet took correspondingly heavy loses: of 102 aircraft lost, 53 were Skyhawks.
That war was not without its moments of distinction. In one engagement, an Israeli A-4 Skyhawk found itself facing 3 MiG-21s. The maneuverable little Skyhawk turned on them and brought 2 of them down, and was reportedly on the 3rd Fishbed’s tail when an IAF Mirage IIIC zipped through and blasted the MiG out of the sky. Per mission losses in 1973 were just 0.6%, a lower figure than the previous 1970 War of Attrition with Egypt. Nevertheless, the writing was on the wall.
When Israel began inducting F-16s, the A-4s began to take a back seat. Some did participate in the 1982 Lebanon War, and one even scored a MiG-17 kill. By that time, however, squadron migrations to the F-16 had already begun, and 33 of the Skyhawks had been sold to Indonesia. By the mid 1990s, almost all of Israel’s fighter squadrons had migrated, and 2000-2001 saw a handful of Israeli Skyhawks sold to corporate operators in BAE and ATSI.
A number of A-4E/H/N aircraft are currently stored at Ovda Air Base, some planes have been used as electronic warfare support aircraft, others have been sold or leased to contractors like ATAC, and as noted earlier, the “Flying Tigers” of 102 Squadron at Hatzerim Air Base still use their A-4Ns and 2-seat TA-4Js for advanced IAF pilot training.
Surviving Israeli aircraft required maintenance, which was being provided by the contractor Kanfei Tahzuka via Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI). Unfortunately, the little plane that could appears to have finally met its match. A scandal has grounded Israel’s Skyhawk fleet – and is about to lead to its replacement.
IAF Replacement Candidates
Candidates to replace the aircraft reportedly include converted IAF early-model F-16Bs, Boeing’s license-produced T-45TS Goshawk used by the US Navy, Finmeccanica’s M346 variant of the Yak-130, and Korea’s supersonic T-50.
The F-16s are reportedly a low-ranking option, because of the difficulty of transitioning from a primary jet trainer like the Fouga Magister or its T-6A turboprop replacement.
The Goshawk would offer a welcome boost for Boeing’s closing production line, and could be purchased with American military aid dollars. The flip side is that the US Navy has not invested in giving them secondary mission capabilities beyond their training role.
The M346’s performance profile and ordnance-carrying capability in a pinch is probably the closest to the Skyhawk’s, but Finmeccanica would have to overcome significant doubts regarding its long-term political stability as a supplier.
South Korea’s supersonic T-50 offers the highest potential performance within the group, with the ability to operate as an “F-16 Lite” in addition to its training role. Israeli firms have made inroads into the Korean market with their UAVs, and a T-50 order could represent the next step for both countries. An agreement that deepened bilateral defense ties, and included Israeli cooperation toward a T/A-50 with light attack capabilities, would create the most capable option for the IAF, while solving a problem for South Korea. The resulting trainer/ light fighter would have the potential for significant ripple effects in the global arms market. That high potential upside would come with a corresponding cost, however, as this would be Israel’s most expensive option.
Usuarios navegando por este Foro: Barkrowler [crawler] y 1 invitado